Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bzip2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225633 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-02-07 10:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > "yum update" alone works. "yum update bzip2*" works, too. We don't add > artificial Requires simply because you think people may be unaware that bzip2 > comes in two parts. If they are unaware, they probably use pup or some other They are not so artificial, since both packages come from the same tarball. Would they have been installed with ./configure && make && make install they would have been together. > graphical interface which will show both packages scheduled for update. > Following your line of reasoning, we'd need to add similar Requires: for all > packages where -libs subpackage exists. Indeed. But I don't make that a blocker, it is just a suggestion (maybe I wasn't clear about that) if the contributor don't like, no problem with me. In that case, the unuseful Requires: bzip2-libs = %{version} should go away, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review