https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819264 --- Comment #5 from pcpa <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> --- I run fedora-review in the above and made a minor correction to the License tag Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/Singular.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/Singular-3.1.3-4.fc18.src.rpm The major issue should be [!]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Singular-3.1.3-3.fc18.i686.rpm : /usr/lib/Singular/dbmsr.so Singular-3.1.3-3.fc18.i686.rpm : /usr/lib/Singular/p_Procs_FieldGeneral.so Singular-3.1.3-3.fc18.i686.rpm : /usr/lib/Singular/p_Procs_FieldIndep.so Singular-3.1.3-3.fc18.i686.rpm : /usr/lib/Singular/p_Procs_FieldQ.so Singular-3.1.3-3.fc18.i686.rpm : /usr/lib/Singular/p_Procs_FieldZp.so Singular-3.1.3-3.fc18.i686.rpm : /usr/lib/libsingular.so .so files under %{_libdir}/Singular are dynamic modules, so this should be ignored. %{_libdir}/libsingular.so is not a symlink, but, the api/abi is very unstable, so, not sure if worth to make a patch to create a versioned shared library; note that this is not the latest upstream release, but the version used by sagemath, and since only sagemath should use it, I would prefer to at first use the version used by sagemath because I already got a huge amount of tests to do for other components using versions different than the ones used by sagemath; linbox and givaro (and several others actually) should require quite a lot of debugging... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review