Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: php-pear Alias: php-pear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226295 ------- Additional Comments From rpm@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-06 18:20 EST ------- I'm happy to spend the time getting the PLD method working (including splitting off Archive_Tar, XML_RPC and Console_Getopt) in Fedora style, but only if we can jointly agree in principle that that's a good thing, and I know Joe was against it before, which is why we need to discuss that. There is an interesting circular dependency there too (PEAR <-> Archive_Tar) which could be fun with mock. I can't readily see how php-pear and php-pear-PEAR could/would be separated, or what that would mean. Remember too (further to my earlier comments) that the "PEAR installer" isn't just the CLI frontend: it's also a PHP library backend for integration with other software - calls direct to the installer's back-end API *are* used by other packages (for example PEAR_Command_Packaging, or the not-yet-RPM-packaged s9y). That said, the current php-pear package does Provide php-pear(PEAR), so if such a thing did become meaningful in future, we already have the mechanism to do it in a reasonably BC way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review