https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834069 --- Comment #6 from Paul Wouters <pwouters@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Note that when writing about software people often capitalize it. I do the same for Openswan for example. But when people install packages, they most often assume or look for lovercased package names, and using a capital is just making it harder for people to find the package. Some minor things: warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib64/Clean warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/Clean Related: You should not need to use the %{_defaultdocdir}. By adding things using %doc it should appear at the proper place. It will then also properly version the doc dir as /usr/share/doc/Clean-2.4-2/ So just do: %doc doc/* Clean.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/clm Guess that's unavoidable now with the debuginfo not really working for clean package. So, OK. Clean.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/Clean/CleanLangRep/CleanRep.2.2.css Can you convert that using tr or dos2unix? # Patch clm to use the /bin directory Can you patch it for /usr/bin since /bin is a symlink to /usr/bin/ With these, I'll approve the package, though I still have a strong preference for a package name without a capital C. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review