[Bug 225778] Merge Review: gcc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: gcc


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225778


jakub@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|jakub@xxxxxxxxxx            |nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|fedora-review-              |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From jakub@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-02-06 16:28 EST -------
According to Jesse Keating that's just a suggestion, not a hard requirement.
Encoding the major/minor version in the spec filename makes it easier to merge
changes side by side between different gcc spec files, and more importantly,
renaming it now would with the crappy CVS mean losing the CVS history for that
file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]