https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834239 --- Comment #7 from Jørn Lomax <northlomax@xxxxxxxxx> --- I always run rpmlint and mock before submiting an updated package. I'll admit i only use the default mock configuration though. I'll make sure to run it on both rawhide and stable from now on. I looked everywhere for that macro, wiki, google and i grep'ed both /etc/rpm and /usr/lib/rpm/macro in hopes of finding it, no luck. What i did not know was that i could run rpmlint on .rpm files, i thought i would get the same output as with the srpms, Now, SPEC: http://jvlomax.fedorapeople.org/packeging/monobristol.spec SRPMS: http://jvlomax.fedorapeople.org/packeging/monobristol-0.60.3-5.fc17.src.rpm rpmlint on the specfile comes out clean rpmlint on SRPMS: >[makerpm@Fafnir SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/monobristol-0.60.3-5.fc17.src.rpm >monobristol.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) bristol -> Bristol, bristle, >bristly >monobristol.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subtractive -> >subtracting, subtracted, subtract >1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. rpmlint on the built package: >monobristol.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subtractive -> >subtracting, subtracted, subtract >monobristol.i686: E: no-binary >monobristol.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib >monobristol.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary monobristol >monobristol.i686: W: percent-in-%post >From what i have read on the wikipage, the no-binary error is solved by making the package a "noarch" package? Which bring up another question i have. When i was searching for macros earlier, i found one titled %mono_arches which is the arches mono builds on. Should i be using this (i was originally, and was told not to anymore) As for getting it to run? is bristol showing up at all after you have pressed a button, or is the monobristol gui not showing at all? I never got any sound from bristol without running it through JACK instead of alsa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review