Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: php-pear Alias: php-pear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226295 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx 2007-02-06 14:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Chris, can you cite a source for the web + GTK installer not being optional with > PEAR 1.5.0? I have PEAR 1.5.0 installed (via "pear upgrade", not via RPM) on a > machine here and I don't have GTK or web installers. > > You are perhaps being confused by the wording on > http://pear.php.net/package/PEAR/download/1.5.0 which says: Yes, I was basing it off this wording, all other pear sites indication optional packages with "(optional)". Even PEAR itself says XML_RPM is optinal but does not mention this for the gtk or web installer parts. I'm glad to know that they are not actually required. This simplifies things tremendously. However due to the number of bugs being fixed and patches no longer required, I am still going to insist on an updated 1.5.0 package before I complete the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review