https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854 --- Comment #28 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #26) > > I'm guessing the above is from inlcuding alsa-devel as a requirement for the > devel pacakge? > I don't think it is for that reason. Those are standard libraries and their linkage is automatic, e.g. you don't need to specify a -lstdc++ during linking. Possibly a bug with the linker? Anyhow this is a problem with the package. We are almost there. The License: GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ tag shall be for the utils subpackage. Since no GPLv2+ code goes to rest, the other packages are pure GPLv3+. I will take a look at your other packages and informal reviews next. Do you use the same email address at FAS? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review