Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: php-pear Alias: php-pear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226295 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx 2007-02-06 14:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > I can't follow most of that. The PEAR class *is* the PEAR installer: they are > one and the same thing. All the PHP tarball does to "install PEAR" is to run a > .phar exactly like php-pear.spec does. I had build the php package after removing the --without-pear option and it only installed a /usr/bin/pear command (nothing under /usr/share/pear). This led me to believe it was different than the .phar install. I guess we are back to square one then. Basically now it is just bootstrapping from php, or from php-pear package. Atleast with php we have a standard official tarball to compare against. So what is the plan with 1.5.0 then? Are you planning on including the web and/or gtk installer or are these optional? According to the web site they are not optional. I now understand your reasonging for the php-pear package and agree with you now (even though I think it sucks, but that is pear's fault not ours). This being said, there are _still_ major changes for the 1.5.0 package and these should be done before I do the review. I don't want to hear any B.S. about having to review what is currently in CVS. I also want to verify that the .phar does not bundle packages that already exist such as Net-UserAgent-Detect package which is now required for the web installer. I'm hoping this wont be a problem if the web installer is optional and not included in the .phar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review