[Bug 825517] Review Request: egtk - The eGTK (elementary GTK) themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity and Xfwm4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517

--- Comment #12 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> And what about the error caused by the incorrect FSF address?
> Can you confirm there's no need to correct it and all I have to do is
> notifying upstream about?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690919#c5

This is what "spot" said. I'm unsure whether we should touch license
declarations in general. If upstream isn't dead yet, you shouldn't change
anything, and wait until the address has been corrected in future releases.
Keep in mind, we don't speak about the license itself, but about an address
where users can get a printed copy of the license text from, if in doubt. But
who would do this really...?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]