Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: php-pear Alias: php-pear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226295 jorton@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From jorton@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-06 13:06 EST ------- I can't follow most of that. The PEAR class *is* the PEAR installer: they are one and the same thing. All the PHP tarball does to "install PEAR" is to run a .phar exactly like php-pear.spec does. The only .phar available is 1.5.0RC2, and the .tgz for PEAR seems to call itself 1.5.0RC3 in the package.xml - CC added for timj; Tim, are you in a position to fix this upstream? php-pear.spec seems to work fine with zero lines of packaging changes with that installer anyway, so what is the big deal with the upgrade? The non-CLI Frontends should be packaged separately from php-pear; I don't see how that is relevant. I have no philosophical objection to moving the PEAR packages bundled with the .phar into subpackages, I'm just not convinced it's technically worth it; XML_RPC at least probably is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review