https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |432228 --- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> --- Sorry, it's beyond my time and interest to dig into this much. For Debian there are tickets from 2009 such as: libnettle-dev is gone, replaced (and not provided) by nettle-dev http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542133 The current naming can be found here: http://packages.debian.org/source/wheezy/nettle nettle (source) libnettle4 libhogweed2 nettle-dev nettle-bin nettle-dbg The old Fedora review is in bug 432228. It passed the "naming and versioning guidelines" requirements there with nettle src.rpm nettle nettle-devel One could try to find out whether https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming has been considered in 2008 and what package names other dists used around that time. Btw, the old review also mentioned a few of the item's I have pointed out, such as the test-suite. The old package has been included in F12 for the last time, so whatever the new naming will be, I don't think it would be necessary to add Obsoletes/Provides for the ancient stuff in F12. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review