https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834516 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Source file is original. Ok. Summary verified from lib/Devel/StringInfo.pm. FIX: Add `or MIT' to the licenses (lib/Devel/StringInfo.pm). Description verified from lib/Devel/StringInfo.pm. Ok. No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok. URL and Source0 are usable. Ok. Build-requires are Ok. All tests pass. Ok. $ rpmlint perl-Devel-StringInfo.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Devel-StringInfo-0.04-1.fc18.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Devel-StringInfo-0.04-1.fc18.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint is Ok. $ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Devel-StringInfo-0.04-1.fc18.noarch.rpm drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jun 22 15:04 /usr/share/doc/perl-Devel-StringInfo-0.04 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 160 May 14 2009 /usr/share/doc/perl-Devel-StringInfo-0.04/Changes -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3365 Jun 22 15:04 /usr/share/man/man3/Devel::StringInfo.3pm.gz drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jun 22 15:04 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Devel -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7976 May 14 2009 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Devel/StringInfo.pm File layout and permissions are Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Devel-StringInfo-0.04-1.fc18.noarch.rpm |sort |uniq -c 1 perl(Encode) 1 perl(Encode::Guess) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2) 1 perl(Moose) 1 perl(namespace::clean) 1 perl(Scalar::Util) 1 perl(Sub::Exporter) 1 perl(Tie::IxHash) 1 perl(utf8) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 FIX: Run-require `perl(YAML)' (lib/Devel/StringInfo.pm:77). FIX: Run-require `perl(Data::HexDump::XXD)' (lib/Devel/StringInfo.pm:91). $ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Devel-StringInfo-0.04-1.fc18.noarch.rpm |sort |uniq -c 1 perl(Devel::StringInfo) = 0.04 1 perl-Devel-StringInfo = 0.04-1.fc18 Binary provides are Ok. Package builds in F18 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4188014). ??? Otherwise package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines. Please correct all `FIX' prefix issues and provides new spec file. Resolution: Package NOT approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review