Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libusb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226053 rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rc040203@xxxxxxxxx| |e) | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-06 10:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I'm not sure about removing the libusb > static library. I can't imagine any reason for needing the static libs, so I am highly in favor of removing them. Nevertheless, introducing *-static would be a compromize, to force those deps on static libs to become apparent and give those packages more time to move to shared libs rsp. to provide a precendence for a case in which static libs are required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review