https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830278 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> --- Koji scratchbuild for Rawhide: * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4176548 REVIEW: Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable + rpmlint is silent work ~/Desktop: rpmlint clojure-maven-plugin-1.3.10-1.fc18.* clojure-maven-plugin.src: W: invalid-url Source0: talios-clojure-maven-plugin-clojure-maven-plugin-1.3.10-0-g48bc0ce.tar.gz ^^^ we should blame github for that (or simply ignore messages like these). 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. work ~/Desktop: + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java ). + Jar file is named properly. + jar file is installed into %{_javadir}. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (Eclipse Public License v.1.0). + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. - The sources used to build the package, MUST match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. ulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum talios-clojure-maven-plugin-* e109443760f253a9ca1eb6d01d0a26fc0f4979466da3c3078fa422a7ed0b25b0 talios-clojure-maven-plugin-1.3.10-0-g403e461.tar.gz 780aec6bcd6d2cd0eb433546bedd22e72055a8a5834a6a617d70d3256d4c979f talios-clojure-maven-plugin-clojure-maven-plugin-1.3.10-0-g48bc0ce.tar.gz sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: Please provide file which can be retrieved using a way provided in the spec's comments. + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. See koji link above. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. 0 No *-javadoc files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No header files. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). 0 No devel sub-package. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Please, provide a properly downloaded Source0 file and I'll finish reviewing this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review