https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833333 Bug ID: 833333 QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: mgoldman@xxxxxxxxxx, notting@xxxxxxxxxx, package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Assignee: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Summary: Review request: cxf - Apache CXF Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: pobara@xxxxxxxxxx Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://dreamertan.fedorapeople.org/srpm/cxf/2.4.7-1.fc17/cxf.spec SRPM URL: http://dreamertan.fedorapeople.org/srpm/cxf/2.4.7-1.fc17/cxf-2.4.7-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Apache CXF is an open-source services framework that aids in the development of services using front-end programming APIs, like JAX-WS and JAX-RS. Notes: 1) This is not latest version, but that's because we need exactly this one atm; (this was discussed with mgoldmann) 2) Many modules are still disabled; out of modules, that we need we're still missing cxf-rt-transports-http and modules, that depend on it (cxf-rt-frontend-jaxws and cxf-rt-frontend-ws-security). That's because we need to have springframework package updated to generate springframework-web and springframework-jms. 3) This package depends on new package ws-xmlschema; it's almost identical to XmlSchema, but newer and can't be easily replaced due to difference in classpath (this would require dumb patch ~2k lines long). 4) cxf developers included all sort of licenses (all free) of projects cxf depend on in one subdir; some of them may not apply, but I opted to include all of them (just in case); code itself is licensed on ASL 2.0, so this is listed in License tag. 5) subpackage cxf-rt should probably be divided into more subpackages, but I feel that it's better to wait until all (sub)submodules in rt are enabled to decide how split should be designed 6) ditto subpackage cxf-tools 7) I spent some time deciding if this package should be named apache-cxf and opted to keep shorter name; rationale is that internally project uses short name more often and it's nice to keep it in line with other cxf-* packages. Also, after cxf-rt split name of subpackages may be quite long as they are already. 8) included patch was automatically generated, that's why it is so big; splitting it into smaller patches is too cumbersome atm 9) I am not sure if there is any policy about using mirrors for source? (apache project insists on using mirrors instead of primary url) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review