Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texi2html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226487 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-02-06 06:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I could update the ja translation only as we have translation included > separately in the RH CVS, I was thinking that you would have wanted to update them in the texi2html CVS... such that they are updated for the next upstream release. > but as I understand it now, I need to update to the > texi2html cvs snapshot in the same time so that the strings match the newer > version of texi2html? The ja translation is now in texi2html CVS, so if you update to the cvs snapshot the ja translation will be in the snapshot, and not (only) in RH CVS anymore -- except if you want to patch it in RH CVS. > Or are the new translations compatible with the old > texi2html-1.76? No, they aren't, in the sense that translations that were in texi2html-1.76 and are not in texi2html-1.77/1.78 are in the OBSOLETE_STRINGS hash. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review