https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830992 --- Comment #11 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #7) > > > Building should be verbose: > > > > Is this a requirement for acceptance? Off-head, I don't know if it's formally mandated. However without it, it's effectively impossible to review a package without major efforts, because the logs don't tell whether a package receives all CFLAGS/CPPFLAGS etc. correctly. > > I ask because to make this change > > with the current release would either require changes upstream or a patch > > carried with the RPM. Are you upstream? Openly said, I'd recommend upstream to switch to a more standardized build/make framework (be it autotools, cmake or what ever), because hand-written makefiles/makefile-fragments, like the ones being using by this package tend to become non-understood and unmaintainable in longer terms. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review