https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830992 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #6) > LGPLv2. LGPLv2.1 to be specific, but from what I read on the Fedora wiki > regarding packaging the LGPLv2 tag applies to both LGPLv2 and LGPLv2.1. What I mean is, is it LGPLv2(.1) "only", or "any later version"? (In reply to comment #7) > > Building should be verbose: > > Is this a requirement for acceptance? I ask because to make this change > with the current release would either require changes upstream or a patch > carried with the RPM. Whether or not it's a requirement, Ralf is right that it makes debugging a whole lot easier. When all you have to go on is a Koji logfile, you'll be grateful that you enabled as much verbosity as possible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review