https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820488 --- Comment #19 from Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #18) > Do not forget that libxradius seems to have more capabilities than > libradius. How are you planning to deal with that? Are you going to > contribute patches that correspond to the diff between two. > > IMO it seems better to contribute to the upstream patches that would split > mod_auth_xradius and libxradius rather than trying to patch libradius to > match libxradius functionality. I think you misunderstood the proposal above, Dmitri. The idea is that we'll forget about packaging libradius entirely (dropping that BZ) and instead build the portions of the mod_auth_xradius as a subpackage providing a shared object called libxradius.so which is build from the mod_auth_xradius source tarball. So there's no diff to concern ourselves with, and we'll pick up the complete set of functionality from libxradius. Is that more clear? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review