[Bug 225875] Merge Review: gtksourceview

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: gtksourceview


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225875





------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx  2007-02-05 10:59 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> I am not going to add a gtk-doc dependency for the /usr/share/gtk-doc/html
> directory. That just doesn't make any sense. You don't need gtk-doc at all
> when using the documenation that lives there. If anything, it would make more
> sense to make devhelp own that directory, but even that is somewhat questionable.

agreed. We shouldn't force any of those deps.

> The whole concept of unique directory ownership is artifical.

Not necessarily, but here, having the package own 
/usr/share/gtk-doc/
and
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html
seems best except if a filesystem only package (maybe filesystem) would 
own that directory, but it is not obvious it would be right.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]