Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtksourceview https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225875 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-02-05 10:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I am not going to add a gtk-doc dependency for the /usr/share/gtk-doc/html > directory. That just doesn't make any sense. You don't need gtk-doc at all > when using the documenation that lives there. If anything, it would make more > sense to make devhelp own that directory, but even that is somewhat questionable. agreed. We shouldn't force any of those deps. > The whole concept of unique directory ownership is artifical. Not necessarily, but here, having the package own /usr/share/gtk-doc/ and /usr/share/gtk-doc/html seems best except if a filesystem only package (maybe filesystem) would own that directory, but it is not obvious it would be right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review