https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829860 --- Comment #1 from Dan Scott <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- In anticipation of a comment regarding the arch specificity of the package and rpmlint's report that it found no binary, perl-MARC-Charset creates a GDBM_File binary object that is not portable. It stores this object in the same Perl directory as the MARC/Charset/Table.pm module. In an effort to prevent two arch-specific packages from being installed on the same system and thereby clobbering one another, I've introduced a symbolic link that points at libdir from MARC/Charset/Table. My intention is that this should introduce a conflict should someone attempt to install two versions of the same arch-specific package. (Debian appears to take the same approach, for whatever that's worth). I checked on #fedora-devel and there didn't seem to be horrified reactions, and they also suggested that rpmlint's warning about no-binary could be ignored as it doesn't understand gdbm, but this is my first time dealing with an oddity like this. If there's a better recommended practice, I'm all ears. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review