Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225635 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-05 10:42 EST ------- now you are being a bit too picky. I'm going to remove the Obsoletes, but here are the answers anyway: (In reply to comment #5) > What is the intended user experience here? > * What should happen if a user has libpixman and old cairo installed and then > tries to update his box to a repository that contains the present version of > cairo? libpixman removed, as is apparently what happens. > * What should happen if he only has libpixman and tries to install cairo from > the same repository? "Don't care". Removed. > * What should happen if a user has a new cairo and then tries to install a > libpixman RPM (using a .rpm file he found somewhere that was copied from > rawhide once)? "Don't care". Conflict. > Having answers for these three cases will help finding the best settings for the > Obsoletes lines. I only can think of two settings: keep them or remove them. Removing defeats the purpose of what it was there for: to clean up an unneeded package. Keeping them does just that. There's nothing special here as the only package that evern depended on libpixman was cairo. But as I said, I'll remove them anyway. (the situation is similar to pango obsoleting pango-gtkbeta and fribidi-gtkbeta). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review