https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821094 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks Volker. (In reply to comment #1) > The description of the devel package mentions "Static libraries", which is > not correct. It also doesn't contain documentation, as advertised. I took a standard text, changed. > Please use the name macro in a consistent way. Added macro for version, too. > The base package must be required in a architecture dependent way, i. e. > using ?_isa: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package Missed that, seams to be new in the guidelines. > Please leave a comment on how to obtain the source tarball. The tarball is provided by upstream. > Please ask upstream to provide a license file, if you haven't already. I asked upstream about the integration of the COPYING. Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/scamper.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/scamper-0-0.2.20111202b.fc16.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review