[Bug 824393] Review Request: perl-Devel-CallParser - Custom parsing attached to subroutines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824393

Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Spec file changes:
--- perl-Devel-CallParser.spec.old      2012-05-24 09:02:35.000000000 -0400
+++ perl-Devel-CallParser.spec  2012-05-29 07:32:34.000000000 -0400
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 BuildRequires:  perl(DynaLoader::Functions)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Exporter)
 BuildRequires:  perl(parent)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Build)
 # Tests
 BuildRequires:  perl(Data::Alias) >= 1.13
 BuildRequires:  perl(Devel::Declare) >= 0.006004
@@ -20,17 +21,19 @@
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Spec)
 BuildRequires:  perl(IO::File) >= 1.03
 BuildRequires:  perl(Lexical::Sub)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Build)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod) >= 1.00
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)
+Requires:       perl(Devel::CallChecker) >= 0.002
 Requires:       perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo
$version))
+Conflicts:      perl(Data::Alias) < 1.13
+Conflicts:      perl(Devel::Declare) < 0.006004

 %{?perl_default_filter}

 %description
 This module provides a C API, for XS modules, concerned with custom
-parsing. It is centred around the function cv_set_call_parser, which allows
+parsing. It is centered around the function cv_set_call_parser, which allows
 XS code to attach a magical annotation to a Perl subroutine, resulting in
 resolvable calls to that subroutine having their arguments parsed by
 arbitrary C code. (This is a more conveniently structured facility than the


> TODO: Move the `perl(Module::Build)' before #Tests. It's need to run Build.PL
> at build-time.
+BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Build)
 # Tests
Ok.

> TODO: Conflict with `perl(Data::Alias) < 1.13' (Build.PL:150). 
> TODO: Conflict with `perl(Devel::Declare) < 0.006004)' (Build.PL:151).
+Conflicts:      perl(Data::Alias) < 1.13
+Conflicts:      perl(Devel::Declare) < 0.006004
Ok.

> TODO: Qualify `perl(Test::Pod)' build-require with `>= 1.00' (t/pod_syn.t:5).
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod) >= 1.00
Ok.

> > TODO: Qualify `perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)' build-require with `>= 1'
> > (t/pod_cvg.t:6).
> There is not specified version of library. Because '1' is return value for
> eval when 'use' passed, if I understand it correctly.
You are right. I missed the semicolon.
Ok.

> TODO: Change `centred' spelling to the American one.
$ rpmlint perl-Devel-CallParser.spec
../SRPMS/perl-Devel-CallParser-0.001-1.fc18.src.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Devel-CallParser-*
perl-Devel-CallParser.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cv -> CV,
xv, cc
perl-Devel-CallParser.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cv -> CV,
xv, cc
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Ok.

> FIX: Run-require `perl(Devel::CallChecker) >= 0.002' (META.yml:37).
$ rpm -q --requires -p
../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Devel-CallParser-0.001-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm |sort |uniq -c
      1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
      1 libc.so.6()(64bit)
      1 perl(Devel::CallChecker) >= 0.001
      1 perl(Devel::CallChecker) >= 0.002
      1 perl(DynaLoader::Functions) >= 0.000
      1 perl(Exporter)
      1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
      1 perl(parent)
      1 perl(strict)
      1 perl(warnings)
      1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
      1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
      1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
      1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
      1 rtld(GNU_HASH)
Ok.

TODO: You can filter the underspecifed dependency `perl(Devel::CallChecker) >=
0.001' now.

Package builds in F18
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4111639). Ok.

Package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines.


Please consider fixing the `TODO' item before building the package.

Resolution: Package APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]