https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252 --- Comment #57 from Christoph Wickert <cwickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #54) > without knowing why there should be an exception to a MUST item > in a package review, beyond that another Fedora package does it, I wouldn't > feel qualified to sign off on an exception. The unversioned libcinnamon.so is ok when the following conditions are met: - It's only used by cinnamon: OK - It's not in the linker's default path but in a subdirectory: OK - It's not provided or required by the package: FIX $ rpm -qp --provides cinnamon-1.4.0-3.UP1.fc18.x86_64.rpm cinnamon = 1.4.0-3.UP1.fc18 cinnamon(x86-64) = 1.4.0-3.UP1.fc18 libcinnamon.so()(64bit) This needs to be stripped out as described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review