https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820543 --- Comment #5 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hello, (In reply to comment #4) > [!]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if > present. > Note: libguac-client-vnc-0.6.0-2.fc16.x86_64.rpm : /usr/lib64/libguac- > client-vnc.so > > Is this file really needed? > > libguac-client-vnc.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib64/libguac-client-vnc.so > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. The main daemon looks for plugins ending in .so (similar to other plugin based systems); if I package the .so file into -devel; the main programs (guacd for now) throw an error when looking for plugins. > Consider to create more explicit file for more control: > %{_libdir}/* Done: Spec URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/libguac-client-vnc.spec SRPM URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/libguac-client-vnc-0.6.0-3.fc17.src.rpm > Have a look at the .so file issue and contact upstream about full licenses > file. I've taken note of all the notes and points of discussion for all the pieces of the stack and I will try to push them upstream once the reviews are over. Thanks, --Simone -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review