https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772485 --- Comment #9 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #8) > "spectool -c wmnd.spec && tar -xf wmnd-0.4.16.tar.gz" works fine here... >... > Could you try it with spectool again please? > [mariobl@t61 SPECS]$ spectool wmnd.spec && tar -xf wmnd-0.4.16.tar.gz Source0: http://www.thregr.org/~wavexx/software/wmnd/releases/wmnd-0.4.16.tar.gz tar: wmnd-0.4.16.tar.gz: Cannot open: No such file or directory tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now Doesn't work for me. Sorry. In other cases, e.g. when the upstream sources are no longer available, I was using the pool at dockapps.windowmaker.org. In our case, the dockapp pool doesn't provide the 0.4.16, but the 0.4.15. There were no significant or bug-critical changes between these releases: commit ab81744cb20cb2ad82f5004217e47a57eb380d00 Author: Yuri D'Elia <yuri.delia@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon Aug 16 17:57:46 2010 +0200 Fix build failure on FreeBSD 8.1 commit 6521413c6b88e9e8ac810ec1c313b6fddeb45734 Author: Yuri D'Elia <yuri.delia@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon Jun 7 18:51:47 2010 +0200 Spelling fixes. I think I should use the 0.4.15 release (from dockapps.windowmaker.org) and eventually patch it to fix the spelling errors. > Another issue would be: it should be "eine Dockapp" - like "eine > Applikation". > ^ Weil es hier um die deutsche Beschreibung geht, weiter in Deutsch. Das Windowmaker-Dockapp ist schon lange ein Neutrum. Steht zwar so nicht im Duden, aber es ist so üblich. Zum Beispiel im Linuxuser: http://www.linux-community.de/Internal/Artikel/Print-Artikel/LinuxUser/2000/10/Jo-s-alternativer-Desktop/%28article_body_offset%29/2 Die Windowmaker-Dockapps sind weitaus älter als die Apps aus den App Stores, Markets usw. deshalb wäre es aus meiner Sicht unnötig, das zu ändern. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review