https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820544 --- Comment #12 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > Why is there the following : > > > BuildRequires: libguac-devel%{?_isa} = %{version} > > > BuildRequires: cairo-devel%{?_isa}, freerdp-devel%{?_isa} < 1.1 > > IMO, isas in these BR's are not useful and would recommend to remove them. Depending on who's doing the review I got mixed results regarding the ISA'ed BRs. Some time is necessary to get the package approved, in some cases it's the opposite. Since libguac has already been approved with ISA'ed BRs and there's no difference in building I would leave them in the spec file for uniformity with all the pieces of the stack. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review