Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225286 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx 2007-02-04 13:04 EST ------- NOTE FOR DISCUSSION: Right now all the individual dictionary aspell packages are technically noarch payloads.. but they need to be arched packages because they want to drop content down in {_libdir}/aspell-0.60 which parses into /usr/lib or /usr/lib64 and thus is arch specific. Does it make sense to change this so that the dictionary's are instead placed in /usr/share? which is not arch specific? Obviously this would be a win in a multilib world. I can't see a long term down-side to rearranging the bits so that aspell dictionary packages could be treated as noarch packages. Am I missing something? Are the dictionary payloads arch specific and I'm just blind? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review