https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818414 --- Comment #2 from Ricky Elrod <codeblock@xxxxxxxx> --- Updating to upstream HEAD. [ricky@t520 RPMS]$ rpmlint ./x86_64/mruby-1.0.0-1.20120526gitf6d539e.fc18.x86_64.rpm mruby.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mruby mruby.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mrbc mruby.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mirb 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. [ricky@t520 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint ./SPECS/mruby.spec ./SPECS/mruby.spec:48: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libmruby.a ./SPECS/mruby.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: mruby-mruby-f6d539e.tar.gz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. The first one is because no matter what I try, cmake is insisting on installing a static lib into /usr/lib/, regardless of architecture. But because it's a static lib, it gets rm'd anyway. The second is because this is pulled from Github, which has no way to easily link to tarballs of commits. Instructions are included in the specfile for obtaining the tar.gz. New links: Spec URL: http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/mruby/mruby.spec SRPM URL: http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/mruby/mruby-1.0.0-1.20120526gitf6d539e.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review