Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cpuspeed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225658 jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- | ------- Additional Comments From jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-04 12:13 EST ------- Okay, I think I *almost* have this one sorted out... I've got the package building on rawhide x86_64 using most of our stock optflags, save -fexceptions, which is the one that was causing the build to fail when switching from CFLAGS= to COPTS= (note that that stock Makefile is set up to pass -fno- exceptions). I've tweaked things a bit further so the -z bits are only passed during linking, so as to suppress some warning messages. ----8<---- + make 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fno-exceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fpie -pie' LDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,relro,-z,now gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fno-exceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp- buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fpie -pie -c -O2 cpuspeed.cc cpuspeed.cc:121: warning: non-local variable '<anonymous struct> speeds [16]' uses anonymous type cpuspeed.cc: In function 'int main(unsigned int, char**)': cpuspeed.cc:810: warning: ignoring return value of 'int daemon(int, int)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fno-exceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp- buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fpie -pie -Wl,-z,relro,-z,now cpuspeed.o -o cpuspeed + exit 0 ----8<---- This results in built packages that, at a glance, seem to be functioning correctly. Unfortunately, I'm still winding up with no source in the debuginfo package for some reason that is beyond me at the moment... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review