[Bug 824507] Review Request: python-jsonschema - An implementation of JSON Schema validation for Python

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824507

Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |markmc@xxxxxxxxxx
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |markmc@xxxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #2 from Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
rpmlint output:

  $ rpmlint ./python-jsonschema.spec 
  0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

  $ rpmlint ./python-jsonschema-0.2-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 
  python-jsonschema.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US validator
-> lavatorial
  1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

  $ rpmlint ./python-jsonschema-0.2-1.fc16.src.rpm 
  python-jsonschema.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US validator ->
lavatorial
  1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Not sure what's wrong with "validator", seems like a common spelling of the
term.

It meets all the MUST and SHOULD guidelines, meets the python specific
guidelines and builds fine in mock.

She's good to go.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]