https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817311 --- Comment #15 from pcpa <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #14) > Excuse me, I just stumbled on this review. I've been building miniupnpc by > myself since now, so I'm really glad someone is packaging it! > However, I noticed tht at least in the scratch build, your package is > missing the python bindings. Is this intentional? Because at least nicotine+ > needs them. I did not add it because it is not built by default and not required by the other package I have a review request, that requires miniupnpc, but I can add it, as well as the java interface if there is interest. > The original tarball includes a script to generate them (see README) but I'm > not sue if that can be used in a Fedora package. I will make a newer package with it enabled for further review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review