https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818401 --- Comment #15 from pcpa <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #13) > They are since many time a spec for 0ad at > http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/bioinfornatics/0ad/ > (not yet updated to latest release alpha X) Thanks for the information. I was only aware of OpenSUSE obs builds for Fedora, and got somewhat involved with it after waiting several months checking from time to time if the Mandriva package was functional... In case the package is approved, I would be glad to have it assigned to a maintainer group :-) > but i do not think 0ad can go to official repo as he is many bundle library > and this it is a no go. The only issue with bundled packages now is fcollada, that either following links in the embedded sources, or the "Download" link from http://collada.org/mediawiki/index.php/FCollada are not working (lead to a link, to information about "formerly Feeling Software", the original authors...). But searching a bit more, I see http://www.wildfiregames.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=14539 But for now I prefer not to add extra review requests, and would be better if there was some legal information about nvidia-texture-tools issue with possibly encumbered s3tc decompression (and compression, but AFAIK compression can be done in non infringing, and faster ways, the problem is decompression that cannot be fully done without infringing the patent). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review