https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822896 --- Comment #10 from Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > > I think the conflict does not matter much, as pari-gp is a pari > > > subpackage. > > > > Don't know what you mean by that. I was wondering whether it was pari-gp > > that used the data packages, or the underlying library "pari" - the conflict > > should refer to the part of pari that actually uses the data. > > pari-gp should require the matching pari version. It does. > The code to handle it > is actually in pari library, but the most common way to access it is from > the gp command line. OK, in view of that I've changed the conflict from pari-gp to pari in -4; given that pari-gp requires the same EVR of pari, that means that it shouldn't be possible to install a too-old version of either pari or pari-gp with this data package. Spec URL: http://subversion.city-fan.org/repos/cfo-repo/pari-elldata/branches/fedora/pari-elldata.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/pari/pari-elldata-20120415-4.src.rpm I think that resolves all outstanding issues with this package thus far. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review