Comment # 2
from Liang Suilong
Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4094937 SPEC: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/fcitx/fcitx-table-other.spec SRPM: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/fcitx/fcitx-table-other-0.1.0-1.fc16.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > Review:- > + koji scratch build for f18 -> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4074057 > > + rpmlint on rpms gave > fcitx-table-other.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ibus -> ibis, > bus, i bus > fcitx-table-other.src: W: strange-permission fcitx-table-other.spec 0775L > fcitx-table-other.src: W: invalid-url Source0: > http://fcitx.googlecode.com/files/fcitx-table-other-0.1.0.tar.xz HTTP Error > 404: Not Found > fcitx-table-other.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ibus -> > ibis, bus, i bus > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. > > > + Source verified with upstream as (sha1sum) > e3deab3d66f87321c1b1e71762e5a529eb2b324b > ../SOURCES/fcitx-table-other-0.1.0.tar.xz > e3deab3d66f87321c1b1e71762e5a529eb2b324b fcitx-table-other-0.1.0.tar.xz > > > Suggestions:- > 1) spec file got strange permissions. use "chmod 644 fcitx-table-other.spec" > and then build srpm and use it to import in Fedora. Fixed > > 2) License is not clear. COPYING says GPLv3+ whereas compose and emoji > tables are LGPLv2+ and LGPL > and spec then says GPLv2+ I contacted with the author. He said the pacakges is a fork from ibus-table-others. I checked the spec file of ibus-table-others and it is under GPLv3. So I think fcitx-table-other is under GPLv3+ is OK.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review