Comment # 7
from pcpa
(In reply to comment #5) > > Only issue I see now is that it should have a "Requires: pari-gp" > > for proper resolution of dependencies. > > Can't do that as it would lead to a circular build dependency for pari > itself, and it's also conceivable that other software could use the same > data without requiring pari-gp. I did add a "Conflicts: pari-gp < 2.2.11" as > that's the oldest version that can use this data, though perhaps that should > be "pari" rather than "pari-gp"? Do you mean these packages will be build requires of pari now? I see they could be useful in a very complete %check. I think the conflict does not matter much, as pari-gp is a pari subpackage. About data reuse, actually, sagemath ships elldata in a different format (not sure if complete and optimized for size, but a lot smaller), as well as it also creates a cremona_mini.db sqlite3 db during build.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review