| What | Removed | Added |
|---|---|---|
| Whiteboard | NotReady |
Comment # 1
from Peter Lemenkov
Ver. 1.0.0 (and cleaned up NotReady flag): * http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-lager.spec * http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-lager-1.0.0-1.fc18.src.rpm Koji scratchbuild for F-18: * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4092462 rpmlint: sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../SRPMS/erlang-lager-1.0.0-1.fc18.src.rpm ../RPMS/ppc/erlang-lager-1.0.0-1.fc18.ppc.rpm erlang-lager.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logrotate -> log rotate, log-rotate, rotate erlang-lager.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US syslog -> slog ^^^ false positives. erlang-lager.src: W: invalid-url Source0: basho-lager-1.0.0-0-g09ecad6.tar.gz ^^^ blame GitHub for that. erlang-lager.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logrotate -> log rotate, log-rotate, rotate erlang-lager.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US syslog -> slog ^^^ false positives. erlang-lager.ppc: E: no-binary erlang-lager.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ^^^ this one is tricky. All erlang packages must be installed into %{_libdir}/erlang/lib so despite of the fact that some of them contains only arch-independent data they all must be build as arch-dependent. I plan to fix thaе but I wouldn't hold my breath. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review