Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822329 Jérôme Martinez <jerome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jerome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #7 from Jérôme Martinez <jerome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-18 11:32:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Then you will want to look again - There are plenty of differences, primarily > related to building the package, because upstream's configuration is a > dysfunctional mess ;) As the original developer of the spec file, I agree ;-). It was made quickly for my own needs (different configs, different distros), without a lot of knowledge about RPM, and it is definitely ugly. > * Wrt. the license: The package contains an LGPL'ed file > => This file's license outrules the license from License.txt and renders this > package as a whole LGPL'ed. Corrected in the SVN: https://sourceforge.net/p/zenlib/code/398/ The intended license is definitely zlib license for this package. (In reply to comment #5) > They are shipping libzen-config inside of their sources, but miss to install it Error from me. It is expected to be installed for people not using pkg-config. I corrected it in the SVN: https://sourceforge.net/p/zenlib/code/399/ Jérôme, developer of mediainfo/libmediainfo and the tiny ugly libzen library used by mediainfo/libmediainfo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review