[Bug 225635] Merge Review: cairo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: cairo


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225635





------- Additional Comments From roozbeh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-02-03 22:10 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> This is intentional and not error.  We are not providing libpixman in cairo. 
> Hiding it.  Anybody depending on libpixman is doomed.  But the only user was
> cairo.  So that's not a problem in reality.

What is the intended user experience here?
* What should happen if a user has libpixman and old cairo installed and then
  tries to update his box to a repository that contains the present version of
  cairo?
* What should happen if he only has libpixman and tries to install cairo from
  the same repository?
* What should happen if a user has a new cairo and then tries to install a
  libpixman RPM (using a .rpm file he found somewhere that was copied from
  rawhide once)?

Having answers for these three cases will help finding the best settings for the
Obsoletes lines.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]