Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225635 ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-03 22:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > This is intentional and not error. We are not providing libpixman in cairo. > Hiding it. Anybody depending on libpixman is doomed. But the only user was > cairo. So that's not a problem in reality. What is the intended user experience here? * What should happen if a user has libpixman and old cairo installed and then tries to update his box to a repository that contains the present version of cairo? * What should happen if he only has libpixman and tries to install cairo from the same repository? * What should happen if a user has a new cairo and then tries to install a libpixman RPM (using a .rpm file he found somewhere that was copied from rawhide once)? Having answers for these three cases will help finding the best settings for the Obsoletes lines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review