Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822329 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-17 02:24:18 EDT --- Then you will want to look again - There are plenty of differences, primarily related to building the package, because upstream's configuration is a dysfunctional mess ;) Some remarks for now: * Do not ship static libs (*.a) * Do not ship libtool *.la's * Last time I checked, the upstream's libzen-config was dysfunctional I added a patch to my package to work around this. * Wrt. the license: The package contains an LGPL'ed file: # grep License Source/ZenLib/* Source/ZenLib/PreComp.h:// under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by Source/ZenLib/PreComp.h:// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or Source/ZenLib/PreComp.h:// GNU Lesser General Public License for more details. Source/ZenLib/PreComp.h:// You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License => This file's license outrules the license from License.txt and renders this package as a whole LGPL'ed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review