Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812659 --- Comment #7 from David Levine <par.packager@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-15 22:53:10 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~levine/par/par-1.52-5.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~levine/par/par-1.52-5.fc16.src.rpm After seeing the discussion about id-utils on the devel mailing list, I think that the par executable should be installed as /usr/lib/par/par. So, par-1.52-5.spec installs these files: /usr/lib/par/par /usr/share/doc/par-1.52/par.doc /usr/share/doc/par-1.52/releasenotes /usr/share/man/man1/par.1.gz The defattr directive can be removed if install explicitly creates the doc dir. Output of rpmlint -o 'ValidLicenses ("Par")': par.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) reformatter -> reformatted, reformatting, reformatory par.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fmt -> ft, mt, fit par.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bodiless -> bodices 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review