Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821771 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-15 09:59:03 EDT --- rpmlint report: sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/erlang-edown-0.2.4-1.fc18.ppc.rpm ../SRPMS/erlang-edown-0.2.4-1.fc18.src.rpm erlang-edown.ppc: E: explicit-lib-dependency erlang-stdlib ^^^ this one is a false positive (stdlib as a trigger) erlang-edown.ppc: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) EDoc -> E Doc, Doc, Educ erlang-edown.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US EDoc -> E Doc, Doc, Educ ^^^ likewise erlang-edown.ppc: E: no-binary erlang-edown.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ^^^ this one is tricky. All erlang packages must be installed into %{_libdir}/erlang/lib so despite of the fact that some of them contains only arch-independent data they all must be build as arch-dependent. I plan to fix than but I wouldn't hold my breath. erlang-edown.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) EDoc -> E Doc, Doc, Educ erlang-edown.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US EDoc -> E Doc, Doc, Educ ^^^ false positives erlang-edown.src: W: invalid-url Source0: esl-edown-v0.2.4-0-gdbdd41e.tar.gz ^^^ blame github for that, not me. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings. sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review