Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808768 Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-15 08:43:54 EDT --- Fixed issue: [x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. Checked now: [x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Some minor problems not blocking the package: [!]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass. Tests are skipped, but a justification is given. [!]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged. A newer upstream version is available. [!]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. The maintainer hasn't asked upstream to include the license text. Because the remaining issues are not very important, annox is: ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review