Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bug-buddy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225629 bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |rstrode@xxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-03 18:14 EST ------- Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. Need to Check: * Ray, you might want to check w/ Rex Dieter about removing the vendor on the desktop file. I believe the vendor needs to remain constant for the life of a package due to menu-editing (which bases off of .desktop file/path names). Minor Non-Blocker: * * Duplicate BuildRequires: libbonobo-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), pango-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), libgnomecanvas-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), gtk2-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), gnome-vfs2-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), glib2-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), libxml2-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), libgnome-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), libglade2-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), libgnomeui-devel (by gnome-desktop-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review