[Bug 812575] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - Cross compiled GStreamer plug-ins "bad"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812575

Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #10 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-11 05:06:50 EDT ---
Full review done:

Good:
--------
- rpmlint checks return:
mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-debuginfo.noarch: E:
debuginfo-without-sources
mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-debuginfo.noarch: E:
debuginfo-without-sources
^^These are all expected for mingw packages, so no problem here ^^
mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.23/COPYING
mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.23/COPYING
mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-debuginfo.noarch: E:
description-line-too-long C This package provides debug information for package
mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.
mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-debuginfo.noarch: E:
description-line-too-long C This package provides debug information for package
mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.
^^ and these can be safely ignored too ^^
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- locales properly handled
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file

Remarks:
-------------
- rpmlint checks return:
mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided
mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-static
mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided
mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-static

Were there ever mingw*-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-static packages in Fedora? If
not I suggest removing the 2 Obsoletes.

No blockers: APPROVED!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]