Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-pl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225280 jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx 2007-02-03 17:46 EST ------- excellent..... (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=147277) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147277&action=view) [edit] > aspell-pl-6.0-2.20061121 > > New, prettier spec file ;) I was going to start marching my way through these aspell library packages as part of the merge review. The new build section you added to enable compression appears to be a general item that I can replicate in all the specs for all the libs. Would you agree? I'm going to do the review of your new spec file... and make that the basis of my merge review. The compression is just too damn good to not use for all the dictionaries. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review