[Bug 820361] Review Request: java-atk-wrapper - Java ATK Wrapper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820361

jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |MODIFIED

--- Comment #8 from jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-10 08:16:01 EDT ---
===summary===

==must be fixed:==
=MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. [7]
*fail* there is missing BUildRequires
=MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
*fail* as already mentioned, one is missing ( I have done this review with
BuildRequires: xorg-x11-utils included in spec)

==should be fixed if there is will and reason to do so:==
=rpmlint technic  warning
=MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. [15]
*fail* It looks like shared library have 775, I suggest to exactly specify
permissions in specfile (however, default 775 are usable), so this can be
considered as ok
=SHOULD: your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts. If it
doesn't, work with upstream to add them where they make sense.[32]
No manual pages. In this case I miss some more info how to enable this (for ANY
 jvm)
=SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A
package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
I have tried, and I was unable to verified. I have included ptisnovs a openjdk
QA to test this. But we have faield to verify even old java-access-bridge
If you have any more ideas how to enable it and verify it I will be very glad


Especially the "function test" is important for me, unless ptisnovs will find
the way:)

==todo when the package is out:==
=test on arm
=include and verify with openjdk7


I know I'm not master-reviewer so feel free to correct me and Ihope I have not
overlook something.

Thanx for your work, and looking forward for fixed version

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]