Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819678 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-09 19:31:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Ok, this looks pretty good so there's only two things I think we need at this > point: > > 1. There doesn't seem to be any sort of license file distributed with the > source, at least not one that's obvious like LICENSE or COPYING. > > http://www.cmake.org/cmake/project/license.html > > says the same thing as Copyright.txt in the source but there's no specific > license referenced. > I'm not sure I follow here - Copyright.txt is essentially the license file, as it stipulates the license for the project, modulo the files with differing licenses where it says: "Some source files contain additional notices of original copyright by their contributors; see each source for details. Third-party software packages supplied with CMake under compatible licenses provide their own copyright notices documented in corresponding subdirectories." I guess I'm not sure what you're asking for that's not in Copyright.txt ? > 2. I'd like to wait until the maintainer comments on 820334 before we call it > approved, although it can always be fixed later. The license field is set by > good faith effort to be in compliance with the guidelines. OK I am happy to wait a bit for this, but I don't think this should be a blocker in itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review